Building 26 Furniture
NSA/CSS Building 26 Furniture
1. The National Security Agency(NSA)/Cyber Security Squadron (CSS) has a requirement
for the installation of new modular furniture, electrical wiring, to pull telecommunication
and the optional tear down/removal and haul away of the current cubicles, furniture,
electrical and information technology wiring for the military personnel located in
Building 26 at Buckley AFB, CO.
2. The government intends to award a firm fixed price contract to the responsible contractor
who provides a reasonably priced, technically acceptable proposal. The offeror must
meet the requirements found in the Statement of Work, dated 05 April 2019.
3. Only a technically acceptable offer will be considered. The Government intends to
evaluate your offer and make award without discussions, however, this does not preclude
the Government from having discussions if it is in the best interest of the Government.
The Government will not reimburse your company for cost to provide a response to this
solicitation notice.
4. There will be a pre-proposal site visit on Thursday, 30 May 19 at 0900 (MST/MDT) in
Bldg. 26. This site visit requires base installation access. In order to ensure installation
access, please submit the full name, driver's license number/ID Number and social
security number of all parties interested in attending the site visit to A1C John Woods at
john.woods.18@us.af.mil by 28 May at Noon (MST/MDT). Attending contractors will
meet Ms. Beth Loftis at the 6th Ave Gate Visitor's Center NLT 0830 in order to ensure
time to process visitor's passes.
5. Request for Information must be emailed to john.woods.18@us.af.mil and
bryan.meredith.1@us.af.mil NLT Noon (MST/MDT) on 03 Jun 2019. Proposals are due
NLT Noon (MST/MDT) on 11 June 2019. The Government will award a contract
resulting from this solicitation to your company only if your proposal conforming to the
solicitation will be advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.
The following factors shall be used to evaluate your offer:
BASIS OF AWARD: IAW FAR 15.304(a) "The award decision is based on evaluation factors
and significant sub-factors that are tailored to the acquisition."
Evaluation Factors and significant sub-factors are listed below by order of precedence:
1. Lead Time
Lead time shall be used as the predominant evaluation factor for this acquisition and will be
significantly more important than cost or price.
2. Price
Prices shall be evaluated by comparison of those proposed prices found to be fair and
reasonable. Fair and reasonableness shall be determined based off of adequate price
NSA/CSS Building 26 Furniture
competition and comparison to the Independent Government Estimate (IGE) established
for this acquisition.
IAW FAR 13.106-1-Soliciting Competition:
(a) Considerations. In soliciting competition, the contracting officer shall consider the guidance
in 13.104 and the following before requesting quotations or offers:
(1)
(i) The nature of the article or service to be purchased and whether it is highly
competitive and readily available in several makes or brands, or is relatively
noncompetitive.
(ii) An electronic commerce method that employs widespread electronic public
notice in not available; and
(iii) The urgency of the proposed purchase.
(iv) The dollar value of the proposed purchase.
(v) Past experience concerning specific dealers' prices.
(2) When soliciting quotations or offers, the contracting officer shall notify potential
quoters or offerors of the basis on which award will be made (price alone or price and
other factors, e.g., past performance and quality). Contracting officers are encouraged to
use best value. Solicitations are not required to state the relative importance assigned to
each evaluation factor and subfactor, nor are they required to include subfactors.
The evaluation process will proceed as follows:
a) Technical Acceptability: the offeror whose proposal represents the best value for the
government will then be ranked according to Technically Acceptable/Unacceptable based
on the following technical qualifications:
i. Service(s) with description, specifications, and/or standards
ii. Technical Approach
iii. If the first offeror whose proposal represents the best value for the government is
determined to be technically acceptable, the evaluation process stops at this point.
Award will be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other
offers. If the offeror whose proposal represents the best value for the government
is not deemed technically acceptable, the next best valued offer will be evaluated
until an offer is deemed technically acceptable. The Government reserves the
right to seek information on higher priced offerors if evaluation of such offerors
may present a better value to the Government.
NSA/CSS Building 26 Furniture
BRYAN MEREDITH, CIV, DAF
CONTRACTING OFFICER
John W. Woods, Contracting Specialist, Phone 720-847-6461, Email john.woods.18@us.af.mil
